Home Brands Indigo Vapor Mint Choco Fusion Review

Indigo Vapor Mint Choco Fusion Review

233
0
SHARE

Indigo has an immaculate record on the website, and a sterling reputation for quality juice.

To date, I’ve reviewed two of their tobacco flavors, Captain Ron and The Duke (both of which received perfect scores), and a handful of their other more fruit forward flavors, but this was the first juice of theirs that I’ve reviewed that fell so squarely in the dessert category.

When I first received the Mint Choco Fusion, as a firm believer that no single vendor can do everything well, I thought that possibly, this juice could reveal a small chink in their armor. Instead, what I found was another example of a skillfully blended, perfectly balanced blend of rich, creamy chocolate that is stunningly realistic in it’s complexity and composition, without so much as a hint of the commonly utilized artificial chocolate flavor I associate with things like chocolate flavored lollipops and hard candies. With the addition of a crisp, cold, sweet mint flavor slicing through the soft, milky chocolate, the overall profile of the juice is full bodied and extraordinarily well-balanced, with a good ratio of creamy chocolate to sweet mint, redolent of an Andes chocolate mint but exponentially more potent and flavorful.

I could continue to wax poetically about this juice, but really there’s no reason to do so. If you like the creamy and vibrant combination of chocolate and mint, do yourself a favor and try Indigo’s take on the classic. One word of caution, this juice is not quite as impervious to heat as some of their other flavors are.

I preferred it at 4.9v on a 2.5Ω atomizer,which produces just over 9.5 watts to bring out the best balance of chocolate to mint, while yielding a spectacular throat hit, and Indigo’s trademark plumes of thick, dense vapor.

REVIEW OVERVIEW
Accuracy of Flavor
Throat hit
Vapor Production
Value
Steeping
SHARE
Previous articleIndigo Vapor Grape Ape Review
Next articleVape Dudes Peach Ice Review

LEAVE A REPLY